The Network Sense

18 Jul, 2008

Praxis Language & Mobile Learning

Posted by: Hank Horkoff In: Mobile Learning

With the iPhone 3G release, mobile learning has been top-of-mind at Praxis Language. Internally, we have been using Woodill and Cunningham-Reid’s definition as a basis:

True mobile learning is personalized learning that unites the learner’s context with cloud computing using a mobile device.

As we evaluate how to improve our personalized learning system we have been comparing our approach against the above definition and contrasting our approach with other methods to learn foreign languages.

To support this analysis we further fleshed out a few definitions. First, in order to be sensitive to the learner’s context one must take into account their current proficiency level, learning goals, personal interests, and other personal/environmental contextual variables. A learning service needs to be able to be personalized to accomplish this. Specifically, it must have the ability to (i) identify student learning goals, (ii) remix lessons into customized courses that can set students on the pathway to these goals, (iii) provide one-to-one practice opportunities and (iv) facilitate personally-tailored, reinforcement opportunities.  Second, ‘cloud computing using a mobile device’ not only represents the ability to access the Internet through an iPod, iPhone, PDA, laptop, etc, but also the social aspect, the community, that goes along with network connectivity.

Textbooks and CD-ROM’s are neither personalized, nor available on a networked device.

Offline classes can offer a degree of personalization, but are not available on a networked mobile device.

Software applications (e.g. iPhone 2.0 app’s), target language media (e.g. Youtube, Youku, etc.), and most language podcasts can be made available on networked mobile devices, but the learning is not personalized.

No existing language learning product currently fits the above description for mobile learning, that is, both personalized and accessible on a networked mobile device.

Customizable courses are the key to breaking down these barriers. Students, or their teachers, should be able to re-mix modular lessons into a course that is specifically designed to solve the student’s individual needs. SafariU is doing this with IT textbooks so why couldn’t the same model - for other subjects - be put online and made available for mobile devices?

The nature of podcasts makes them the ideal ‘plumbing’ to facilitate mobile learning.  Being modular by design, podcast lessons could be re-mixed and put into personalized courses. Furthermore, podcasts rely on RSS distribution, which is channel agnostic and can equally distribute learning media to any networked device. Many language podcast publishers have forsaken this opportunity by adopting backward-looking, textbook-emulating linear curriculums.

Imagine a scenario where a student gets a 20-minute needs analysis with a counselor over a phone. The counselor identifies the student’s needs and then re-mixes an appropriate course from an archive of lessons. A family wanting to adopt a Chinese child - no problem. An expat who wants to be able to better work in his Chinese office environment - no problem. The student then starts a daily routine of (i) listening to podcasts on the way to work, (ii) taking 10 minutes in the morning to go onto the website and review the lesson they heard earlier, (iii) practising their new language with a co-worker or a teacher via Skype for 15 minutes at lunch and then (iv) reviewing the vocab they previously saved to the personal accounts by using flashcards on their iPhone on the trip home.

This is the mobile learning vision - that is both personalized and available on a networked mobile device - that our Guided products are trying to achieve.

8 Responses to "Praxis Language & Mobile Learning"

1 | Michael

July 20th, 2008 at 10:34 pm

Avatar

Great post. Lots of food for thought. I have trouble with the word personalization however. You can’t personalize something to the nth degree. There are limits to the personalization process and that limit is your learning library (A) and your capacity to make more learning units (B)and the complexity of stringing the learning units together in a coherent, systematic fashion(C). I find it fascinating that you are (?) moving in the systems direction because it seems to be at odds with your original shotgun approach to C-POd. I am not however surprised.

The problem is that with even a library of 1,000 pieces to mix and match that there is no guarantee that the pieces will connect together. Good linear courses do have one value for some people, they are designed to connect things together from the get go.

You guys rejected the linear approach in the past but I think over time you have tried to glue the desparate pieces together with all sorts of material creation rules that apply Krashen’s abstract i+1 rule.

So, back to your example. Why give a need’s analysis in the first place? Why not just ask students to just check off their interests? Simply because there are more criteria in designing a language program than simply what the student is interested in. You need to follow a progressive schedule but your library may not be robust enough to personalize the course work without missing all the important i+1 linguistic glue that allows a student to move easily between the personalized segments.

In my mind this linguistic glue is even more interesting than individualized personalized lessons. In fact, if I read my own students correctly, they would rather spend time getting the “glue” down pat than spending time working on personalized lessons if the “glue” in those lessons is weak or non-existant.

I’m not sold completely on personalization. It is just one factor in creating good curriculum. It is hardly the most important thing. Words like fun, challenging, social, even transformational seem to me to be more important than personalized. Your definition above didn’t mention any of these things. It sounds a bit dry. I hope you breath life into the definition.

2 | Hank Horkoff

July 21st, 2008 at 5:58 pm

Avatar

Michael,

I appreciate the thoughtful comment.

I see ‘personalization’ more as the ideal representation of trying to keep student needs as the central focus, as opposed to just offering a generic service.

The strength of a modular design approach is its flexibility. Modular design only provides the building blocks, on top of which courses can be constructed - as we do with our Lesson Sets.

If the opposite, linear approach was taken no personalization would be possible. Why should adopting parents and expat professionals be stuck with the same generic material? Students should be able to efficiently spend their time on the learning that is most appropriate to their individual needs.

3 | Michael

July 22nd, 2008 at 9:58 am

Avatar

Hank,

I agree that at some point their needs diverage but at least in the beginning their needs are very similar. One important key is not so much what role they are playing but rather how long they intend on learning the language.

Particularly if their needs are long-term then they both have many common areas that they must master.

Numbers, sounds, sentence order, prepositions, basic verbs, intonation, days of the week, etc. all take precedence to any specialized vocabulary in the beginning. For example both are probably 10 times more likely to hear the verb for eat over the course of a day than they are to hear the word “adopt” (adopting parents) or “international trade ” (expats).

Students are much better served by being given vocabulary they are likely to hear and the vocabulary they are most likely to hear IS NOT specialized vocabulary it is the vocabulary of daily life.

Most first time students unfortunately do not understand this. They trust curriculum designers to make these informed decisions. People who learn a 3rd and 4th language naturally understand this and at the beginning stage most are looking to master the words with the greatest GENERAL coverage first.

If I can fault anything with your approach, it is the importance of giving students a strong foundation in the basics as quickly as possible without a great deal of personalized side detours. I understand however that listening to areas of personal interest tends to increase motivation and probably results in more time on task. You have made huge leaps in this area. So, in the end it is a trade-off. You can see now why I have reservations about the word personalization. In beginning language courses I think it is wrong-headed to be too fixated with this concept.

I hope I haven’t stepped on too many toes!

4 | Hank Horkoff

July 22nd, 2008 at 10:48 am

Avatar

Michael,

Again, appreciate the feedback. I agree there is often an initial hump for serious language learners (as opposed to those who learn for travel purposes or are just casually interested). I think this is particularly clear in the case of Chinese, where a crash course in pinyin and tone pronunciation is critically important.

5 | Streaming Me » Languages classes: pros and cons

July 31st, 2008 at 6:26 am

Avatar

[...] learning. I believe as concepts like blended learning (mixing online and offline experiences) and mobile learning (pushing online learning into the real world) mature the wholesale replacement of traditional [...]

6 | Streaming Me » Dipping corporate toes into social media

August 6th, 2008 at 2:33 pm

Avatar

[...] the greater conversation going on concerning topics that matter to us — language, learning, mobile technology, podcasting, etc. The blogs many of our staff and founders — Ken Carroll, Hank Horkoff, John [...]

7 | Android a few weeks away?

August 15th, 2008 at 10:40 am

Avatar

[...] does this matter to learners? At Praxis, we believe that mobile learning is the direction education is moving, and that mobility is key to learning on your terms (namely, the “learn anywhere” [...]

8 | Buying an iPhone in Shanghai | Sinosplice: Life

August 25th, 2008 at 10:10 am

Avatar

[...] employer, Praxis Language, is a leader in the field of mobile language learning, so it strongly encourages key employees (in the form of a nice subsidy) to get [...]

Comment Form


  • Buying an iPhone in Shanghai | Sinosplice: Life: [...] employer, Praxis Language, is a leader in the field of mobile language learning, so it strongly encourages key employees (in the form of a nice
  • farhad: hello, i visit your blog. i search for book " virtual learning" Judy Breck. if you acces that, please send me. thanks
  • Android a few weeks away?: [...] does this matter to learners? At Praxis, we believe that mobile learning is the direction education is moving, and that mobility is key to learn

About

Me?
Hank Horkoff. Co-founder & CEO of Praxis Language Ltd. Contact me at hank.horkoff at gmail dot com.

Praxis Language?
At Praxis Language we believe that we are at the beginning of a decades-long period of transition in education where podcasting, the social web & mobile devices will increasingly give more power to the training consumer causing a shift from a traditional, classroom-centric model to a more flexible, learner-centric, continuous learning model.